Corrections Log
Every material correction we have made to questions, explanations and factual claims, with what was wrong and what changed.
Last reviewed August 4, 2026
The log
1 correction published, newest first.
Four subtest timings were wrong and the scheduled break was missing during pre-launch development.
COR-0001 · affects: Reading Comprehension timing; Situational Judgment item count and timing; Instrument Comprehension timing; Block Counting timing; The scheduled break
- What was wrong
- An earlier development build of this site stated Reading Comprehension as 38 minutes, Situational Judgment as 50 items in 35 minutes, Instrument Comprehension as 8 minutes and Block Counting as 4 minutes 30 seconds, and it omitted the 15-minute break between Situational Judgment and the Self-Description Inventory entirely. Those figures were not taken from the delivery provider and were incorrect.
- What changed
- Every figure was rechecked against the delivery provider on 4 August 2026 and corrected: Reading Comprehension 25 items in 24 minutes, Situational Judgment 16 items in 35 minutes, Instrument Comprehension 25 items in 5 minutes, Block Counting 30 items in 5 minutes, and the 15-minute break restored to its real position. Scored items total 276. The exam baseline is now generated from a single sourced file so no page can state a count or timing independently of it.
- How it was found
- Internal source recheck before launch. The fix has been propagated everywhere the claim appeared.
How corrections work here
- Material errors are logged. A wrong answer key, an incorrect explanation, or a factual claim about the exam that is no longer true. Each gets an entry stating what was wrong and what changed.
- Typos and formatting are not. Logging every comma would bury the corrections that matter.
- Nothing is deleted. Entries stay published permanently, including old and embarrassing ones.
- Disputed items come out first. Where an answer key is challenged, the question is suspended and stops being served while we investigate, rather than staying live during the argument.
- Fixes are propagated. A factual correction is applied everywhere the claim appeared, not only on the page where it was reported. Each entry records whether that is complete.
Severity
- High — a wrong answer key, or a factual error that could change a candidate’s decision about testing.
- Medium — a misleading or incomplete explanation, or an out-of-date figure with no decision impact.
- Low — an ambiguous prompt or a weak distractor we have rewritten.
Report an error
Send the page address, the question id if there is one, and why you believe it is wrong, through the contact page. A report that explains the reasoning is far more useful than one that only says the answer looks off, and it is the fastest route to getting a bad item withdrawn.
Our accuracy and sourcing standards are set out in the editorial policy, and how questions are produced and validated is on the question methodology page.
Who wrote this, how it was made, and why
- Who
- Written by the AFOQTPracticeTest.net editorial team. We do not yet have named subject-matter reviewers with verifiable credentials attached to this site, and we will not invent them — so this page carries no expert byline. See authors and reviewers for how review works today and what we are changing.
- How
- The log is generated from an append-only record in the codebase. Entries cannot be edited or deleted once published; a subsequent change is a new entry.
- Why
- A study site that never publishes a correction is not a site that never makes mistakes. Publishing them lets a reader judge how we handle being wrong.
- Last reviewed
- August 4, 2026. Read our editorial policy or report an error.